Many legal commentators apparently believe that, in the term that just ended, the Supreme Court further enabled President Donald Trump. The court did, in fact, issue a series of conservative decisions ...

The legacy that I'm leaving, I hope it's bigger than me.” Data and insights powered by #paid Advertisement © 2025 TIME USA, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our ...

Many legal commentators apparently believe that, in the term that just ended, the Supreme Court further enabled President ...

In letters made public via the Freedom of Information Act, Attorney General Pam Bondi argued the president has the authority ...

TikTok races to launch a U.S.-based version of its platform by September 5 in a bid to avoid a federal ban and navigate ...

The U.S. government would initiate deportation proceedings against Kilmar Abrego Garcia if he's released from jail before he ...

NPR speaks with Zachary Price, law professor at the University of California College of Law San Francisco, about the Trump administration's rationale for exempting tech companies from the TikTok ban.

The justices concluded that kids’ access to online porn is serious enough to change the ground rules of First Amendment law, ...

Still, claiming that the president has inherent powers to nullify represents an unprecedented power grab by the Trump ...

The country has become so divided, some scholars say, that leaders of the three branches are often more loyal to their ...

The Supreme Court categorically rejected the argument that the mere regulation of an algorithm raises First Amendment ...

The justices refused to take up the cases of a teacher fired over social media posts and a student who alleged harassment ...