A Supreme Court ruling about discrimination claims was a win for the rule of law, not a judicial ideology, Bloomberg Opinion columnist Noah Feldman writes. Skip to content All Sections ...

NEWSLETTERS The ‘reverse discrimination’ US Supreme Court ruling could’ve been much worse There are bigger battles ahead to fight.

It remains unclear following the oral argument whether the panel was convinced President Trump cleared the bar to be allowed to argue in federal court that his hush money conviction should be tossed.

Noah Feldman: ‘Reverse discrimination’ ruling is a win for the rule of law Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — arguably the Supreme Court’s most progressive member — emphasized that the text ...

What SCOTUS Actually Said About Workplace Fairness in This Year’s Big “Reverse Discrimination” Case The lawyer who successfully argued Ames v.

This is Trump's third attempt to move the state case to federal court. The matter is being litigated by Sullivan & Cromwell. Trump's former criminal defense attorneys, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove ...

In an opinion by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — arguably the Supreme Court’s most progressive member — the justices eliminated that additional requirement for reverse discrimination claims.

On June 5, 2025, the Supreme Court unanimously held that a Plaintiff alleging reverse discrimination under Title VII be held to the same standard as if they belonged to another suspect class. Ames ...

The Supreme Court on Friday turned away the Republican National Committee’s (RNC) bid to block Pennsylvania voters’ in-person, do-over option when they return a defective mail ballot.

Tiffany Dunkin of the First Liberty Institute calls the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling a major win for religious freedom and a clear rebuke of government overreach.

‘Reverse Discrimination’ Ruling Is a Win for the Rule of Law The Supreme Court decision isn’t a victory for conservatives or liberals. June 6, 2025 at 9:49 AM EDT ...